On Thu, Dec 6, 2012 at 10:18 AM, George Galt <george.g...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Paulo:
>
> Thanks. I've installed it and it seems to be working (FYI, I'm still on
> FC16 x86_64, for anyone who is wondering if it works on that distribution).
>
> On addressing the conflict, I'm not sure that same filtering will work,
> but simply adding a rm -f {path}/nvidia-cuda-proxy to the pre-install macro
> might work. The only problem is that there is no recovery if the rest of
> the install fails. I suppose you could move it to a nividia-cuda-proxy.old
> file and alert the user as a recoverable alternative, but that might create
> other issues. I'm just not experienced enough with building RPMs to know
> which would be the best course.
>
> Thanks for all of your work on this driver. Hopefully I can be of more
> help in the future.
If this file is to be contained in each versioned set of RPMs, maybe it
should be renamed and versioned as the kmdl is and have a symlink changed
with nvidia-graphics-switch.
/Brian/
_______________________________________________
atrpms-devel mailing list
atrpms-devel@atrpms.net
http://lists.atrpms.net/mailman/listinfo/atrpms-devel
