Interesting. I did not notice anything yet, and I can run the C program below just fine:
http://forums.gentoo.org/viewtopic-p-7435944.html I was having gkrellm dying with version 319.49, but it seems stable until now with 321.20 Maybe this depends on the card type, but I did not see any report for fedora, and rpm fusion is shipping this driver for F19: http://download1.rpmfusion.org/nonfree/fedora/updates/19/x86_64/repoview/index.html Anyway, I removed a test, for applying patch0, from the spec file, which was causing the kernel module compilation fail for fedora. On Mon, Dec 16, 2013 at 6:13 PM, Chris Schanzle <schan...@nist.gov> wrote: > On 12/15/2013 12:58 PM, Paulo Cavalcanti wrote: > > Axel, > > > > I fixed the latest driver, so it builds the kernel module: > > > > > http://people.atrpms.net/~pcavalcanti/srpms/nvidia-graphics331.20-331.20-162.fc18.src.rpm< > http://people.atrpms.net/%7Epcavalcanti/srpms/nvidia-graphics331.20-331.20-162.fc18.src.rpm > > > > > > Can you put the wheels to run again? > > > > Thanks. > > > > -- > > Paulo Roma Cavalcanti > > LCG - UFRJ > > > > We have found the process signal mask is randomly but frequently corrupted > with this version of the drivers. Causes all sorts of interresting issues, > like GUI subprocess elements don't quit when the main parent exits. > > A quick google search of "nvidia 331.20 signal mask" leads to this thread, > and in particular, the following post: > https://devtalk.nvidia.com/default/topic/633706/linux/recent-drivers-cause-applications-to-hang-not-start-at-all-or-compilation-failures/post/4031596/#4031596 > > I suggest more caution than usual before releasing this version. > > > > _______________________________________________ > atrpms-devel mailing list > atrpms-devel@atrpms.net > http://lists.atrpms.net/mailman/listinfo/atrpms-devel > -- Paulo Roma Cavalcanti LCG - UFRJ
_______________________________________________ atrpms-devel mailing list atrpms-devel@atrpms.net http://lists.atrpms.net/mailman/listinfo/atrpms-devel
