Matthias Hensler wrote:
On Sun, Nov 13, 2005 at 10:09:11PM +0100, Tako Schotanus wrote:
Axel Thimm wrote:
Yes, otherwise the support would be incomplete. I'm not yet sure how
to add this, as some of the packages that are replaced will make the
mob angry and shout "ATrpms replaces fedora core packages!" ;)
Well, currently no Fedora package is replaced: the mkinitrd scripts are
installed seperately. However there might be a better solution (having
this in upstream would be great, maybe it will happen sooner or later,
since mkinitrd from rawhide already includes support for swsusp1).
Maybe swsusp2 and friends should get into their own repository class,
which is not any more on the linear stable-testing-bleeding category.
We'll see. First we need to make sure swsusp2 really works on most
boxes.
The current packages should be pretty stable, at least for i586, i686
and i686-smp. However, for x86_64 a lot of testing is required (the
architectures is still early development).
Well the x86_64 version at least doesn't work on my system. According to
the hibernate.log it performs all the shutdown scripts and when finally
suspending I get a black screen with some kind of dump but I didn't find
any of it in any log file so I can't mail it.
Any ideas?
Cheers,
-Tako
_______________________________________________
atrpms-users mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.atrpms.net/mailman/listinfo/atrpms-users
