On Mon, Nov 06, 2006 at 09:17:07PM +1100, Alex Kruchkoff wrote: > Axel Thimm wrote, On 06/11/06 21:07: > > On Mon, Nov 06, 2006 at 09:02:17PM +1100, Alex Kruchkoff wrote: > > > >>> I'm getting closer... > >>> > >>> > >> Indeed: > >> > >> My /etc/apt/sources.list.d/atrpms.list now is: > >> > >> repomd http://dl.atrpms.net el$(VERSION)-$(ARCH)/atrpms/stable > >> rpm http://dl.atrpms.net el4-i386/atrpms stable > >> > > > > Do you really need both? > > > From fc5 I remember openoffice was 32 bit only, i downgraded myself > firefox to 32 bits to install flash etc... > Plus centos anaconda already installed a lots of 32 bits packages... > > BTW I already commented out the second line [but I could not complete > packages removal without this (or may be I'm fooling myself?...) ] > Tied and it's the time to go home ;-)
The i386 packages that a x86_64 system should require are already in the x86_64 repo. E.g. no need to enable all i386 packages for ATrpms. Or if there really is a need then it's a package specific bug you should report :) -- Axel.Thimm at ATrpms.net
pgpvfbpHJI2kw.pgp
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ atrpms-users mailing list [email protected] http://lists.atrpms.net/mailman/listinfo/atrpms-users
