On Tue, May 01, 2007 at 03:04:10PM -0700, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > Some of the myth packages needed required the base repo version, > while libmyth-devel required the atrpms version. > I don't really need libmyth-devel, so I'm no longer running into the > conflict with libXvMCW/libXvMC. > > However there still is a slight problem. mythtv-suite meta package > is not installable because it can't find PIL which mytharchive > needs.
It is in atrpms-testing. > I believe this is for python-imaging, which I beleive is already > part of base. > > I was able to install just the parts i need to get mythtv running, > but mytharchive would be nice. And the meta package should probably > be looked at. > > Is there an IRC channel on freenode that atrpms people typically > hang out at? Not really, maybe we should use #atrpms. > Luis > > ---- Axel Thimm <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > On Tue, May 01, 2007 at 01:55:38PM -0700, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > > Hi guys, > > > New to the list, not sure if this is the right place to ask. > > > > > > I didn't find anything in bugzilla, but it seems that > > > libXvMCW.i386 from atrpms conflicts with libXvMC.i386 from base. > > > > > > I'm running into this problem while trying to install the mythtv > > > packages. > > > > > > Any ideas? > > > > Can you post the full command & output? Is libXvMC already installed, > > or does yum/apt/smart try to pull in both at the same time? If so try > > installing libXvMC before mythtv and see if it fixed the issue (it > > doesn't fix the issue, it still need to be addressed, but this > > would be a workaround untile there is a proper fix). > > > > You can either do that in this thread or open up a bug at > > bugzilla.atrpms.net, whatever suits you better. -- Axel.Thimm at ATrpms.net
pgpahLJTjmpjo.pgp
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ atrpms-users mailing list [email protected] http://lists.atrpms.net/mailman/listinfo/atrpms-users
