On Tue, Apr 29, 2008 at 10:15:00PM -0400, xyon wrote:
> Thank you, it is better.
> 
> Unfortunately I am now faced with a dilemma. My typical first actions
> when putting together a fresh server is to add ATRpms to yum repos,
> install apt via yum, then add the atrpms repo to the apt sources.list. 
> 
> Since I skipped atrpms during the recent install of a server, I am faced
> with installing atrpm's apt after centos's. I am currently faced with
> the below problem, and a bit afraid to go further:
> 
> # apt-get install apt
> Reading Package Lists... Done
> Building Dependency Tree... Done
> The following extra packages will be installed:
>   libbeecrypt6 librpm4.4 neon popt pythonabi rpm rpm-python
> The following packages will be upgraded
>   apt popt rpm rpm-python
> The following packages will be REPLACED:
>   rpm-libs (by librpm4.4)
> The following NEW packages will be installed:
>   libbeecrypt6 librpm4.4 neon pythonabi
> 4 upgraded, 4 newly installed, 1 replaced, 0 removed and 10 not
> upgraded.
> Need to get 0B/3155kB of archives.
> After unpacking 1309kB of additional disk space will be used.
> Do you want to continue? [Y/n]  
> Committing changes...
> Preparing...                ###########################################
> [100%]
>         file /usr/lib/libbeecrypt.so.6 from install of
> libbeecrypt6-4.1.2-10.1_14.el4.at conflicts with file from package
> beecrypt-3.1.0-6
> E: Error while running transaction
> 
> All packages so far have been installed via centos' official
> repositories. Is there a "safe" way across this?

Compatibility between CentOS/Scientific Linux/other clones
etc. with3rd party repos is something we work on. For now just make a
choice and stick with it.

BTW since this is a fresh install why use CentOS4 and not CentOS5?

> On Wed, 2008-04-30 at 00:56 +0300, Axel Thimm wrote:
> > On Mon, Apr 28, 2008 at 03:36:34PM -0500, john bray wrote:
> > > On Mon, 2008-04-28 at 15:41 -0400, xyon wrote:
> > > > I'm having trouble connecting to Atrpms. It's hanging on connect and/or
> > > > getting Headers. Anyone else having this issue?
> > > > 
> > > > Thanks,
> > > 
> > > yah, same here.  i guess there are problems there just now.
> > 
> > Hi,
> > 
> > actually the problem is mythdora users using download accelerators. I
> > tuned the filters a bit and it should be better now.
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> atrpms-users mailing list
> [email protected]
> http://lists.atrpms.net/mailman/listinfo/atrpms-users

-- 
Axel.Thimm at ATrpms.net

Attachment: pgp5edrQhxmO9.pgp
Description: PGP signature

_______________________________________________
atrpms-users mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.atrpms.net/mailman/listinfo/atrpms-users

Reply via email to