Hi, On Sat, Feb 14, 2009 at 08:09:46AM +0200, Axel Thimm wrote: > On Tue, Feb 10, 2009 at 12:00:29AM -0800, David Rees wrote: > > On Thu, Feb 5, 2009 at 1:25 PM, Axel Thimm <[email protected]> wrote: > > > On Thu, Feb 05, 2009 at 11:33:34AM -0800, David Rees wrote: > > >> I'm getting various 403 Forbidden responses from a number of areas of > > >> the web site. Known issue? > > >> > > >> http://atrpms.net/dist/el5/ > > > > > > for some reason the index files are missing. I'll check and > > > recreate them. Thanks for spotting this! > > > > Any update on this? I'm trying to dig up a .src.rpm, but it's a bit > > tough to read the web-servers mind. :-) > > I didn't manage to find the reason for this missing indexes. The for > loop's output simply stops shortly before, it is probably some bug in > a previous indexing html.
OK, I found the issue. It was t he new RHEL 5.3 rpm segfaulting on rpm
-qp --qf '%{buildtime}' when used on a specfile. Unfortunately it only
segfaulted at el5/hibernate and not right away, so it was hard to
spot. That rpm was installed on "Sun 01 Feb 2009 11:49:32 PM CET", so
any website re-creating after that was failing. This coincides nicely
with David's original report 4 days later.
At any rate I changed the scripts to use ls for querying the
"buildtime" for specfiles and the currently running script seems to
work properly!
Give it another hour or so and the web site bits should be restored to
the working state. :)
The yum repos were not affected by this, only web browsing/googling
was broken.
> But for pulling out a src.rpm out of ATrpms you can always use
>
> http://dl.atrpms.net/src/f10-x86_64/atrpms/stable/
>
> (replace parts of the above accordingly if this is not for F10 or if
> the package is not yet elevated to stable status).
--
Axel.Thimm at ATrpms.net
pgp1IYOgMuIGJ.pgp
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ atrpms-users mailing list [email protected] http://lists.atrpms.net/mailman/listinfo/atrpms-users
