On Sat, Jul 3, 2010 at 5:46 PM, John Pilkington <j.p...@tesco.net> wrote:
> Paulo Cavalcanti wrote: > >> >> >> On Fri, Jul 2, 2010 at 12:15 PM, John Pilkington <j.p...@tesco.net<mailto: >> j.p...@tesco.net>> wrote: >> >> On 02/07/10 14:49, Paulo Cavalcanti wrote: >> >> >> >> On Fri, Jul 2, 2010 at 10:04 AM, Brian Long >> <briandl...@gmail.com <mailto:briandl...@gmail.com> >> <mailto:briandl...@gmail.com <mailto:briandl...@gmail.com>>> >> wrote: >> >> On Fri, Jul 2, 2010 at 3:00 AM, John Pilkington >> <j.p...@tesco.net <mailto:j.p...@tesco.net> >> <mailto:j.p...@tesco.net <mailto:j.p...@tesco.net>>> wrote: >> >> Output from vlc-1.1.0-55.f...@x86_64: >> /var/tmp/rpm-tmp.DMn2nv: line 2: vlc-cache-gen: command >> not found >> warning: %post(vlc-1.1.0-55.fc12.x86_64) scriptlet >> failed, exit >> status 127 >> >> And xulrunner didn't upgrade because I don't yet have >> firefox 3.6 >> >> >> I don't see vlc 1.1.0 available on f13 x86_64 in any of the >> AtRPMS >> repos. Was it built for f13? >> >> >> It is on the way. >> >> We are having trouble with vlc 1.1.0 on RHEL5, but I think >> everything has ben fixed. >> >> I am wathing Brasil x Holand right now with vlc 1.1.0 (v4l2) on >> RHEL5!! >> >> >> I ought to say that vlc f12 seems to be working well for me in spite >> of the installation error report. I hope yuor viewing is enjoyable... >> >> But yesterday I did an upgrade on my el5 P4 box and I now see no v4l >> entries in dmesg. I haven't used it for OTA stuff recently so I'm >> not sure if this is new. A dvb usb stick works, but no sign of >> saa7134 or my PCI dvb card. dmesg does say 'video_buf exports >> duplicate symbol videobuf_mmap_mapper (owned by videobuf_core)' and >> says it four times. >> I tried renaming video-buf.ko to .obsolete, which used to be thought >> helpful. That silenced the complaint but didn't make things work. >> I'll try to investigate more later but at present it's a puzzle >> rather than a disaster. >> >> >> >> >> Well, there are new kernels, which bring new problems. >> >> Do you have video4linux installed? >> What is the version of your module-init-tools? >> >> >> Hi Paulo, thanks for this. I'm afraid I haven't been keeeping up with > the el5 box and hadn't noticed your warning note of 6 April. It looks > as if reinstalling version 42 has done the trick. I found it here but > it looks as if it's becoming an endangered item. > > > http://linux1.fnal.gov/linux/fermi/slf53/i386/SL/module-init-tools-3.3-0.pre3.1.42.el5.i386.rpm > > I see that I had version 54 'locked' in Smart, but unfortuntely it must > have been locked out rather than in, and I had forgotten to retain my > earlier copy of the .42. package. > > This is with kernel 2.6.18-194.3.1 and the April ! v4l packages. > > Shame about the soccer... > > John P > > And my apologies for once again hitting 'reply' and mailing Paulo instead > of the list. > > > > I do not know it this is of interest to anybody, but I upgraded to firefox 3.6.6 on F10-F12. It was easier than I thought. I added a Provides: xulrunner-devel-unstable = %{version} in Axel's xulrunner spec, recompiled it and used the .src.rpm from F12, with the tarball updated to 3.6.6: http://orion.lcg.ufrj.br/RPMS/myrpms-f12-x86_64/repoview/firefox.html http://orion.lcg.ufrj.br/RPMS/myrpms-f12-x86_64/repoview/xulrunner.html I only had to remove *perl*-*Gtk2*-MozEmbed, which was not been using by any package (I think Miro used it in the past). It is running great in all my computers so far .... -- Paulo Roma Cavalcanti LCG - UFRJ
_______________________________________________ atrpms-users mailing list atrpms-users@atrpms.net http://lists.atrpms.net/mailman/listinfo/atrpms-users
