Paulo: Yes, I've checked and I have fakeroot 1.12. What is the difference and is there any way to use 1.12?
/var/lib should be writeable, but I'll check again. Thanks for the help. George On Wed, Aug 15, 2012 at 6:30 PM, Roma <pro...@gmail.com> wrote: > You have to use fakeroot 1.11 and > /var/lib must be writable (chmod 777) > > You should be able to downgrade fakeroot once you get the source from f12, I > guess, and recompile it .... > > Sent from my iPod > > On 15/08/2012, at 15:18, George Galt <george.g...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> Paulo (or anyone): >> >> I've been trying to use Paulo's directions found here: >> http://people.atrpms.net/~pcavalcanti/LCG_kernel_modules.html#user to >> build my own set of nvidia kmdls. I've been practicing on the >> existing kernel before moving on to the latest kernel, but I keep >> getting the error below: >> >> -> License accepted by command line option. >> -> Installing NVIDIA driver version 302.17. >> -> Skipping check for conflicting rpms. >> ERROR: No NVIDIA driver is currently installed; the >> '--kernel-module-only' option can only be used to install the NVIDIA >> kernel module on top of an existing driver installation. >> + test -z '' >> + exit 1 >> error: Bad exit status from /home/ggalt/rpmbuild/tmp/rpm-tmp.nlq8Xy >> (%install) >> >> >> I get this error after executing the command: ./bkmdl.sh 3.4.2-1.fc16 >> nvidia-graphics302.17-302.17-147.src.rpm >> >> I currently have the following installed: >> nvidia-graphics302.17-libs-302.17-146.fc16.x86_64 >> nvidia-graphics302.17-kmdl-3.4.2-1.fc16-302.17-146.fc16.x86_64 >> nvidia-graphics302.17-302.17-146.fc16.x86_64 >> nvidia-graphics-helpers-0.0.30-33.fc16.x86_64 >> nvidia-graphics-devices-1.0-6.fc16.noarch >> >> >> Any thoughts? >> >> Thanks, >> >> George _______________________________________________ atrpms-users mailing list atrpms-users@atrpms.net http://lists.atrpms.net/mailman/listinfo/atrpms-users
