All: I've followed Paulo's directions to build the nvidia libs and kmdl in the past with great success; however, I've always used a src.rpm from Axel's repository to do so. Since there isn't one yet for the 310 driver, I thought I would follow Paulo's directions from a week or so ago to substitute the new binary blob from nvidia and adjust the .spec file, then rebuild the src.rpm file.
I've done that, but I get a bunch of errors when trying to build the lib file in the form of: -> Unable to access previously installed file 'rpmbuild/BUILDROOT/nvidia-graphics310.14-310.14-150.fc16.x86_64/usr/lib64/libnvidia-glcore.so.310.14' (No such file or directory). -> Unable to access previously installed file 'rpmbuild/BUILDROOT/nvidia-graphics310.14-310.14-150.fc16.x86_64/usr/lib64/libGL.so.310.14' (No such file or directory). -> Unable to access previously installed file 'rpmbuild/BUILDROOT/nvidia-graphics310.14-310.14-150.fc16.x86_64/usr/lib64/xorg/modules/extensions/libglx.so.310.14' (No such file or directory). -> Unable to access previously installed file 'rpmbuild/BUILDROOT/nvidia-graphics310.14-310.14-150.fc16.x86_64/usr/lib64/libnvidia-tls.so.310.14' (No such file or directory). These file are all there, but in a slightly different location. For all of these files, the location is the same as expected by the .spec file, but with the addition of the driver name to the path. So 'rpmbuild/BUILDROOT/nvidia-graphics310.14-310.14-150.fc16.x86_64/usr/lib64/libnvidia-glcore.so.310.14', should really be 'rpmbuild/BUILDROOT/nvidia-graphics310.14-310.14-150.fc16.x86_64/usr/lib64/nvidia-graphics-310.14/libnvidia-glcore.so.310.14' and 'rpmbuild/BUILDROOT/nvidia-graphics310.14-310.14-150.fc16.x86_64/usr/lib64/xorg/modules/extensions/libglx.so.310.14' should really be 'rpmbuild/BUILDROOT/nvidia-graphics310.14-310.14-150.fc16.x86_64/usr/lib64/xorg/modules/extensions/nvidia-graphics-310.14/libglx.so.310.14' In each case, the path differs by the addition of "nvidia-graphics-310.14" before the file being looked for. Does anyone have any idea how to either adjust the spec file or alter the way it looks for these files? Thanks, George
_______________________________________________ atrpms-users mailing list atrpms-users@atrpms.net http://lists.atrpms.net/mailman/listinfo/atrpms-users
