Here is the errors from the log :
Jan 20 14:14:17 htpc gdm: Child process 1100 was already dead.
Jan 20 14:14:17 htpc gdm: GLib-GObject: g_object_ref: assertion
`object->ref_count > 0' failed
Jan 20 14:14:17 htpc gdm: GLib-GObject: g_object_unref: assertion
`object->ref_count > 0' failed
Jan 20 14:14:17 htpc systemd: Started Wait for Plymouth Boot Screen to Quit.
Jan 20 14:14:17 htpc dbus-daemon: dbus[1037]: [system] Rejected send
message, 1 matched rules; type="method_call", sender=":1.5" (uid=0
pid=1049 comm="/usr/sbin/gdm ")
interface="org.freedesktop.DBus.Properties" member="GetAll" error
name="(unset)" requested_reply="0" destination=":1.13" (uid=0 pid=2949
comm="/usr/libexec/gdm-simple-slave --display-id /org/gn")
Jan 20 14:14:17 htpc dbus[1037]: [system] Rejected send message, 1
matched rules; type="method_call", sender=":1.5" (uid=0 pid=1049
comm="/usr/sbin/gdm ") interface="org.freedesktop.DBus.Properties"
member="GetAll" error name="(unset)" requested_reply="0"
destination=":1.13" (uid=0 pid=2949 comm="/usr/libexec/gdm-simple-slave
--display-id /org/gn")
Jan 20 14:14:18 htpc gdm: Child process 2954 was already dead.
Jan 20 14:14:18 htpc gdm: GLib-GObject: g_object_ref: assertion
`object->ref_count > 0' failed
Jan 20 14:14:18 htpc gdm: GLib-GObject: g_object_unref: assertion
`object->ref_count > 0' failed
Jan 20 14:14:18 htpc gdm: GdmDisplay: display lasted 0.052607 seconds
Jan 20 14:14:18 htpc dbus-daemon: dbus[1037]: [system] Rejected send
message, 1 matched rules; type="method_call", sender=":1.5" (uid=0
pid=1049 comm="/usr/sbin/gdm ")
interface="org.freedesktop.DBus.Properties" member="GetAll" error
name="(unset)" requested_reply="0" destination=":1.14" (uid=0 pid=2955
comm="/usr/libexec/gdm-simple-slave --display-id /org/gn")
Jan 20 14:14:18 htpc dbus[1037]: [system] Rejected send message, 1
matched rules; type="method_call", sender=":1.5" (uid=0 pid=1049
comm="/usr/sbin/gdm ") interface="org.freedesktop.DBus.Properties"
member="GetAll" error name="(unset)" requested_reply="0"
destination=":1.14" (uid=0 pid=2955 comm="/usr/libexec/gdm-simple-slave
--display-id /org/gn")
Jan 20 14:14:18 htpc gdm: Child process 2960 was already dead.
Jan 20 14:14:18 htpc gdm: GLib-GObject: g_object_ref: assertion
`object->ref_count > 0' failed
Jan 20 14:14:18 htpc gdm: GLib-GObject: g_object_unref: assertion
`object->ref_count > 0' failed
Jan 20 14:14:18 htpc gdm: GdmDisplay: display lasted 0.051834 seconds
Jan 20 14:14:18 htpc avahi-daemon[988]: Registering new address record
for fe80::5246:5dff:fe50:b5ca on enp5s0.*.
Jan 20 14:14:18 htpc dbus-daemon: dbus[1037]: [system] Rejected send
message, 1 matched rules; type="method_call", sender=":1.5" (uid=0
pid=1049 comm="/usr/sbin/gdm ")
interface="org.freedesktop.DBus.Properties" member="GetAll" error
name="(unset)" requested_reply="0" destination=":1.15" (uid=0 pid=2961
comm="/usr/libexec/gdm-simple-slave --display-id /org/gn")
Jan 20 14:14:18 htpc dbus[1037]: [system] Rejected send message, 1
matched rules; type="method_call", sender=":1.5" (uid=0 pid=1049
comm="/usr/sbin/gdm ") interface="org.freedesktop.DBus.Properties"
member="GetAll" error name="(unset)" requested_reply="0"
destination=":1.15" (uid=0 pid=2961 comm="/usr/libexec/gdm-simple-slave
--display-id /org/gn")
Jan 20 14:14:18 htpc gdm: Child process 2966 was already dead.
Jan 20 14:14:18 htpc gdm: GLib-GObject: g_object_ref: assertion
`object->ref_count > 0' failed
Jan 20 14:14:18 htpc gdm: GLib-GObject: g_object_unref: assertion
`object->ref_count > 0' failed
Jan 20 14:14:18 htpc gdm: GdmDisplay: display lasted 0.257969 seconds
Jan 20 14:14:18 htpc dbus-daemon: dbus[1037]: [system] Rejected send
message, 1 matched rules; type="method_call", sender=":1.5" (uid=0
pid=1049 comm="/usr/sbin/gdm ")
interface="org.freedesktop.DBus.Properties" member="GetAll" error
name="(unset)" requested_reply="0" destination=":1.16" (uid=0 pid=2967
comm="/usr/libexec/gdm-simple-slave --display-id /org/gn")
Jan 20 14:14:18 htpc dbus[1037]: [system] Rejected send message, 1
matched rules; type="method_call", sender=":1.5" (uid=0 pid=1049
comm="/usr/sbin/gdm ") interface="org.freedesktop.DBus.Properties"
member="GetAll" error name="(unset)" requested_reply="0"
destination=":1.16" (uid=0 pid=2967 comm="/usr/libexec/gdm-simple-slave
--display-id /org/gn")
Jan 20 14:14:18 htpc gdm: Child process 2972 was already dead.
Jan 20 14:14:18 htpc gdm: GLib-GObject: g_object_ref: assertion
`object->ref_count > 0' failed
Jan 20 14:14:18 htpc gdm: GLib-GObject: g_object_unref: assertion
`object->ref_count > 0' failed
Jan 20 14:14:18 htpc gdm: GdmDisplay: display lasted 0.052946 seconds
Jan 20 14:14:18 htpc dbus-daemon: dbus[1037]: [system] Rejected send
message, 1 matched rules; type="method_call", sender=":1.5" (uid=0
pid=1049 comm="/usr/sbin/gdm ")
interface="org.freedesktop.DBus.Properties" member="GetAll" error
name="(unset)" requested_reply="0" destination=":1.17" (uid=0 pid=2974
comm="/usr/libexec/gdm-simple-slave --display-id /org/gn")
Jan 20 14:14:18 htpc dbus[1037]: [system] Rejected send message, 1
matched rules; type="method_call", sender=":1.5" (uid=0 pid=1049
comm="/usr/sbin/gdm ") interface="org.freedesktop.DBus.Properties"
member="GetAll" error name="(unset)" requested_reply="0"
destination=":1.17" (uid=0 pid=2974 comm="/usr/libexec/gdm-simple-slave
--display-id /org/gn")
Jan 20 14:14:18 htpc gdm: Child process 2979 was already dead.
Jan 20 14:14:18 htpc gdm: GLib-GObject: g_object_ref: assertion
`object->ref_count > 0' failed
Jan 20 14:14:18 htpc gdm: GLib-GObject: g_object_unref: assertion
`object->ref_count > 0' failed
Jan 20 14:14:18 htpc gdm: GdmDisplay: display lasted 0.266998 seconds
Jan 20 14:14:18 htpc dbus-daemon: dbus[1037]: [system] Rejected send
message, 1 matched rules; type="method_call", sender=":1.5" (uid=0
pid=1049 comm="/usr/sbin/gdm ")
interface="org.freedesktop.DBus.Properties" member="GetAll" error
name="(unset)" requested_reply="0" destination=":1.18" (uid=0 pid=2988
comm="/usr/libexec/gdm-simple-slave --display-id /org/gn")
Jan 20 14:14:18 htpc dbus[1037]: [system] Rejected send message, 1
matched rules; type="method_call", sender=":1.5" (uid=0 pid=1049
comm="/usr/sbin/gdm ") interface="org.freedesktop.DBus.Properties"
member="GetAll" error name="(unset)" requested_reply="0"
destination=":1.18" (uid=0 pid=2988 comm="/usr/libexec/gdm-simple-slave
--display-id /org/gn")
Jan 20 14:14:18 htpc NetworkManager[983]: <info> Policy set 'enp5s0'
(enp5s0) as default for IPv4 routing and DNS.
Jan 20 14:14:18 htpc gdm: Child process 2993 was already dead.
Jan 20 14:14:18 htpc gdm: GLib-GObject: g_object_ref: assertion
`object->ref_count > 0' failed
Jan 20 14:14:18 htpc gdm: GLib-GObject: g_object_unref: assertion
`object->ref_count > 0' failed
Jan 20 14:14:18 htpc gdm: GdmDisplay: display lasted 0.051764 seconds
Jan 20 14:14:18 htpc gdm: GdmLocalDisplayFactory: maximum number of X
display failures reached: check X server log for errors
On 20/01/15 14:17, mo.ucina wrote:
Hello Guys,
I just loaded nvidia-graphics346.35-346.35-172.el7.x86_64 and can not
boot into graphic mode at all . There may be some other things in
there as well . I am going to fall back to 169 .
Best Regards
Milorad
On 20/01/15 09:41, Stephen Collier wrote:
Thanks I'll make the changes.
Stephen
Sent from my Samsung GALAXY S4 on the Telstra 4G network
<div>-------- Original message --------</div><div>From: NullDev<nullde...@gmail.com> </div><div>Date:20/01/2015 8:26 AM
(GMT+10:00) </div><div>To: "User discussion about ATrpms.net"<atrpms-users@atrpms.net> </div><div>Subject: Re: [ATrpms-users]
new nvidia long term 346.35 </div><div>
</div>I had similar issues. I ended up creating 2 symlinks and the problem
went away:
/usr/lib64/vdpau/libvdpau_nvidia.so.1 ->
../nvidia-graphics-343.36/vdpau/libvdpau_nvidia.so.1
and
/usr/lib64/vdpau/libvdpau_nvidia.so -> libvdpau_nvidia.so.1
Derek Burt Monday, January 19, 2015 4:03 PM
judi...@bigpond.net.au
On 19/01/2015 8:27 pm, mo.ucina wrote:
Hello Stephen,
Can you please run a set of packages on this one when time permits .
On another topic I am on the rev 169 of the current 340.65 drivers for
el7 64bit. I know that 170 had a small bug , which prompted the 171
release . I tried the 171 but it gave me stuttered video on mythtv .
Have you tried it your self , is it working ok for you ? So I have
fallen back to 169 for the time being .
Best Regards
Milorad
Milorad,
I'm running 171 release on el6 x86_64 and f19 i386 which seem OK. There
may be something different as they are created in a completely different
way due to the creation on a vm now. I'll have a look and see if I can
find any more differences between 169 and 171.
On the 365 front it should be built automatically - I'll check the script.
I had issues with vpdau on the latest packages (.65) on el7 x86_64. I had to
move the files for vdpau around to match what was in the .58 packages and move
some symlinks to get everything working again. My apologies but I didn't
document exactly what the issue was, was just trying to get the frontend
running again and didn't take good notes :( Sufficed to say, some of the vdpau
related files had changed locations, etc. Other than vdpau, everything seems
to be running okay now.
Derek
_______________________________________________
atrpms-users mailing list
atrpms-users@atrpms.net
http://lists.atrpms.net/mailman/listinfo/atrpms-users
Thanks I'll make the changes.
Stephen
Sent from my Samsung GALAXY S4 on the Telstra 4G network
-------- Original message --------
From: NullDev
Date:20/01/2015 8:26 AM (GMT+10:00)
To: "User discussion about ATrpms.net"
Subject: Re: [ATrpms-users] new nvidia long term 346.35
I had similar issues. I ended up creating 2 symlinks and the problem
went away:
/usr/lib64/vdpau/libvdpau_nvidia.so.1 ->
../nvidia-graphics-343.36/vdpau/libvdpau_nvidia.so.1
and
/usr/lib64/vdpau/libvdpau_nvidia.so -> libvdpau_nvidia.so.1
Derek Burt <mailto:derekb...@gmail.com>
Monday, January 19, 2015 4:03 PM
judi...@bigpond.net.au <mailto:judi...@bigpond.net.au>
On 19/01/2015 8:27 pm, mo.ucina wrote:
> Hello Stephen,
>
> Can you please run a set of packages on this one when time
permits .
> On another topic I am on the rev 169 of the current 340.65
drivers for
> el7 64bit. I know that 170 had a small bug , which prompted
the 171
> release . I tried the 171 but it gave me stuttered video on
mythtv .
> Have you tried it your self , is it working ok for you ? So I have
> fallen back to 169 for the time being .
>
> Best Regards
> Milorad
>
Milorad,
I'm running 171 release on el6 x86_64 and f19 i386 which seem
OK. There
may be something different as they are created in a completely
different
way due to the creation on a vm now. I'll have a look and see if
I can
find any more differences between 169 and 171.
On the 365 front it should be built automatically - I'll check
the script.
I had issues with vpdau on the latest packages (.65) on el7 x86_64.
I had to move the files for vdpau around to match what was in the
.58 packages and move some symlinks to get everything working
again. My apologies but I didn't document exactly what the issue
was, was just trying to get the frontend running again and didn't
take good notes :( Sufficed to say, some of the vdpau related files
had changed locations, etc. Other than vdpau, everything seems to
be running okay now.
Derek
_______________________________________________
atrpms-users mailing list
atrpms-users@atrpms.net
http://lists.atrpms.net/mailman/listinfo/atrpms-users
_______________________________________________
atrpms-users mailing list
atrpms-users@atrpms.net
http://lists.atrpms.net/mailman/listinfo/atrpms-users
_______________________________________________
atrpms-users mailing list
atrpms-users@atrpms.net
http://lists.atrpms.net/mailman/listinfo/atrpms-users
