Check what /var/log/Xorg.0.log shows It should show more informative information.
Cheers Stephen Sent from my Samsung GALAXY S4 on the Telstra 4G network <div>-------- Original message --------</div><div>From: "mo.ucina" <mo.uc...@gmail.com> </div><div>Date:20/01/2015 3:08 PM (GMT+10:00) </div><div>To: "User discussion about ATrpms.net" <atrpms-users@atrpms.net> </div><div>Subject: Re: [ATrpms-users] new nvidia long term 346.35 </div><div> </div>Here is the errors from the log : Jan 20 14:14:17 htpc gdm: Child process 1100 was already dead. Jan 20 14:14:17 htpc gdm: GLib-GObject: g_object_ref: assertion `object->ref_count > 0' failed Jan 20 14:14:17 htpc gdm: GLib-GObject: g_object_unref: assertion `object->ref_count > 0' failed Jan 20 14:14:17 htpc systemd: Started Wait for Plymouth Boot Screen to Quit. Jan 20 14:14:17 htpc dbus-daemon: dbus[1037]: [system] Rejected send message, 1 matched rules; type="method_call", sender=":1.5" (uid=0 pid=1049 comm="/usr/sbin/gdm ") interface="org.freedesktop.DBus.Properties" member="GetAll" error name="(unset)" requested_reply="0" destination=":1.13" (uid=0 pid=2949 comm="/usr/libexec/gdm-simple-slave --display-id /org/gn") Jan 20 14:14:17 htpc dbus[1037]: [system] Rejected send message, 1 matched rules; type="method_call", sender=":1.5" (uid=0 pid=1049 comm="/usr/sbin/gdm ") interface="org.freedesktop.DBus.Properties" member="GetAll" error name="(unset)" requested_reply="0" destination=":1.13" (uid=0 pid=2949 comm="/usr/libexec/gdm-simple-slave --display-id /org/gn") Jan 20 14:14:18 htpc gdm: Child process 2954 was already dead. Jan 20 14:14:18 htpc gdm: GLib-GObject: g_object_ref: assertion `object->ref_count > 0' failed Jan 20 14:14:18 htpc gdm: GLib-GObject: g_object_unref: assertion `object->ref_count > 0' failed Jan 20 14:14:18 htpc gdm: GdmDisplay: display lasted 0.052607 seconds Jan 20 14:14:18 htpc dbus-daemon: dbus[1037]: [system] Rejected send message, 1 matched rules; type="method_call", sender=":1.5" (uid=0 pid=1049 comm="/usr/sbin/gdm ") interface="org.freedesktop.DBus.Properties" member="GetAll" error name="(unset)" requested_reply="0" destination=":1.14" (uid=0 pid=2955 comm="/usr/libexec/gdm-simple-slave --display-id /org/gn") Jan 20 14:14:18 htpc dbus[1037]: [system] Rejected send message, 1 matched rules; type="method_call", sender=":1.5" (uid=0 pid=1049 comm="/usr/sbin/gdm ") interface="org.freedesktop.DBus.Properties" member="GetAll" error name="(unset)" requested_reply="0" destination=":1.14" (uid=0 pid=2955 comm="/usr/libexec/gdm-simple-slave --display-id /org/gn") Jan 20 14:14:18 htpc gdm: Child process 2960 was already dead. Jan 20 14:14:18 htpc gdm: GLib-GObject: g_object_ref: assertion `object->ref_count > 0' failed Jan 20 14:14:18 htpc gdm: GLib-GObject: g_object_unref: assertion `object->ref_count > 0' failed Jan 20 14:14:18 htpc gdm: GdmDisplay: display lasted 0.051834 seconds Jan 20 14:14:18 htpc avahi-daemon[988]: Registering new address record for fe80::5246:5dff:fe50:b5ca on enp5s0.*. Jan 20 14:14:18 htpc dbus-daemon: dbus[1037]: [system] Rejected send message, 1 matched rules; type="method_call", sender=":1.5" (uid=0 pid=1049 comm="/usr/sbin/gdm ") interface="org.freedesktop.DBus.Properties" member="GetAll" error name="(unset)" requested_reply="0" destination=":1.15" (uid=0 pid=2961 comm="/usr/libexec/gdm-simple-slave --display-id /org/gn") Jan 20 14:14:18 htpc dbus[1037]: [system] Rejected send message, 1 matched rules; type="method_call", sender=":1.5" (uid=0 pid=1049 comm="/usr/sbin/gdm ") interface="org.freedesktop.DBus.Properties" member="GetAll" error name="(unset)" requested_reply="0" destination=":1.15" (uid=0 pid=2961 comm="/usr/libexec/gdm-simple-slave --display-id /org/gn") Jan 20 14:14:18 htpc gdm: Child process 2966 was already dead. Jan 20 14:14:18 htpc gdm: GLib-GObject: g_object_ref: assertion `object->ref_count > 0' failed Jan 20 14:14:18 htpc gdm: GLib-GObject: g_object_unref: assertion `object->ref_count > 0' failed Jan 20 14:14:18 htpc gdm: GdmDisplay: display lasted 0.257969 seconds Jan 20 14:14:18 htpc dbus-daemon: dbus[1037]: [system] Rejected send message, 1 matched rules; type="method_call", sender=":1.5" (uid=0 pid=1049 comm="/usr/sbin/gdm ") interface="org.freedesktop.DBus.Properties" member="GetAll" error name="(unset)" requested_reply="0" destination=":1.16" (uid=0 pid=2967 comm="/usr/libexec/gdm-simple-slave --display-id /org/gn") Jan 20 14:14:18 htpc dbus[1037]: [system] Rejected send message, 1 matched rules; type="method_call", sender=":1.5" (uid=0 pid=1049 comm="/usr/sbin/gdm ") interface="org.freedesktop.DBus.Properties" member="GetAll" error name="(unset)" requested_reply="0" destination=":1.16" (uid=0 pid=2967 comm="/usr/libexec/gdm-simple-slave --display-id /org/gn") Jan 20 14:14:18 htpc gdm: Child process 2972 was already dead. Jan 20 14:14:18 htpc gdm: GLib-GObject: g_object_ref: assertion `object->ref_count > 0' failed Jan 20 14:14:18 htpc gdm: GLib-GObject: g_object_unref: assertion `object->ref_count > 0' failed Jan 20 14:14:18 htpc gdm: GdmDisplay: display lasted 0.052946 seconds Jan 20 14:14:18 htpc dbus-daemon: dbus[1037]: [system] Rejected send message, 1 matched rules; type="method_call", sender=":1.5" (uid=0 pid=1049 comm="/usr/sbin/gdm ") interface="org.freedesktop.DBus.Properties" member="GetAll" error name="(unset)" requested_reply="0" destination=":1.17" (uid=0 pid=2974 comm="/usr/libexec/gdm-simple-slave --display-id /org/gn") Jan 20 14:14:18 htpc dbus[1037]: [system] Rejected send message, 1 matched rules; type="method_call", sender=":1.5" (uid=0 pid=1049 comm="/usr/sbin/gdm ") interface="org.freedesktop.DBus.Properties" member="GetAll" error name="(unset)" requested_reply="0" destination=":1.17" (uid=0 pid=2974 comm="/usr/libexec/gdm-simple-slave --display-id /org/gn") Jan 20 14:14:18 htpc gdm: Child process 2979 was already dead. Jan 20 14:14:18 htpc gdm: GLib-GObject: g_object_ref: assertion `object->ref_count > 0' failed Jan 20 14:14:18 htpc gdm: GLib-GObject: g_object_unref: assertion `object->ref_count > 0' failed Jan 20 14:14:18 htpc gdm: GdmDisplay: display lasted 0.266998 seconds Jan 20 14:14:18 htpc dbus-daemon: dbus[1037]: [system] Rejected send message, 1 matched rules; type="method_call", sender=":1.5" (uid=0 pid=1049 comm="/usr/sbin/gdm ") interface="org.freedesktop.DBus.Properties" member="GetAll" error name="(unset)" requested_reply="0" destination=":1.18" (uid=0 pid=2988 comm="/usr/libexec/gdm-simple-slave --display-id /org/gn") Jan 20 14:14:18 htpc dbus[1037]: [system] Rejected send message, 1 matched rules; type="method_call", sender=":1.5" (uid=0 pid=1049 comm="/usr/sbin/gdm ") interface="org.freedesktop.DBus.Properties" member="GetAll" error name="(unset)" requested_reply="0" destination=":1.18" (uid=0 pid=2988 comm="/usr/libexec/gdm-simple-slave --display-id /org/gn") Jan 20 14:14:18 htpc NetworkManager[983]: <info> Policy set 'enp5s0' (enp5s0) as default for IPv4 routing and DNS. Jan 20 14:14:18 htpc gdm: Child process 2993 was already dead. Jan 20 14:14:18 htpc gdm: GLib-GObject: g_object_ref: assertion `object->ref_count > 0' failed Jan 20 14:14:18 htpc gdm: GLib-GObject: g_object_unref: assertion `object->ref_count > 0' failed Jan 20 14:14:18 htpc gdm: GdmDisplay: display lasted 0.051764 seconds Jan 20 14:14:18 htpc gdm: GdmLocalDisplayFactory: maximum number of X display failures reached: check X server log for errors On 20/01/15 14:17, mo.ucina wrote: > Hello Guys, > > I just loaded nvidia-graphics346.35-346.35-172.el7.x86_64 and can not > boot into graphic mode at all . There may be some other things in > there as well . I am going to fall back to 169 . > > Best Regards > > Milorad > > On 20/01/15 09:41, Stephen Collier wrote: >> Thanks I'll make the changes. >> >> Stephen >> >> >> Sent from my Samsung GALAXY S4 on the Telstra 4G network >> >> <div>-------- Original message --------</div><div>From: >> NullDev<nullde...@gmail.com> </div><div>Date:20/01/2015 8:26 AM >> (GMT+10:00) </div><div>To: "User discussion about >> ATrpms.net"<atrpms-users@atrpms.net> </div><div>Subject: Re: [ATrpms-users] >> new nvidia long term 346.35 </div><div> >> </div>I had similar issues. I ended up creating 2 symlinks and the problem >> went away: >> >> /usr/lib64/vdpau/libvdpau_nvidia.so.1 -> >> ../nvidia-graphics-343.36/vdpau/libvdpau_nvidia.so.1 >> >> and >> >> /usr/lib64/vdpau/libvdpau_nvidia.so -> libvdpau_nvidia.so.1 >> Derek Burt Monday, January 19, 2015 4:03 PM >> judi...@bigpond.net.au >> On 19/01/2015 8:27 pm, mo.ucina wrote: >>> Hello Stephen, >>> >>> Can you please run a set of packages on this one when time permits . >>> On another topic I am on the rev 169 of the current 340.65 drivers for >>> el7 64bit. I know that 170 had a small bug , which prompted the 171 >>> release . I tried the 171 but it gave me stuttered video on mythtv . >>> Have you tried it your self , is it working ok for you ? So I have >>> fallen back to 169 for the time being . >>> >>> Best Regards >>> Milorad >>> >> Milorad, >> >> I'm running 171 release on el6 x86_64 and f19 i386 which seem OK. There >> may be something different as they are created in a completely different >> way due to the creation on a vm now. I'll have a look and see if I can >> find any more differences between 169 and 171. >> >> On the 365 front it should be built automatically - I'll check the script. >> >> I had issues with vpdau on the latest packages (.65) on el7 x86_64. I had >> to move the files for vdpau around to match what was in the .58 packages and >> move some symlinks to get everything working again. My apologies but I >> didn't document exactly what the issue was, was just trying to get the >> frontend running again and didn't take good notes :( Sufficed to say, some >> of the vdpau related files had changed locations, etc. Other than vdpau, >> everything seems to be running okay now. >> >> Derek >> _______________________________________________ >> atrpms-users mailing list >> atrpms-users@atrpms.net >> http://lists.atrpms.net/mailman/listinfo/atrpms-users >> >> >> Thanks I'll make the changes. >> >> Stephen >> >> >> Sent from my Samsung GALAXY S4 on the Telstra 4G network >> >> >> -------- Original message -------- >> From: NullDev >> Date:20/01/2015 8:26 AM (GMT+10:00) >> To: "User discussion about ATrpms.net" >> Subject: Re: [ATrpms-users] new nvidia long term 346.35 >> >> I had similar issues. I ended up creating 2 symlinks and the problem >> went away: >> >> /usr/lib64/vdpau/libvdpau_nvidia.so.1 -> >> ../nvidia-graphics-343.36/vdpau/libvdpau_nvidia.so.1 >> >> and >> >> /usr/lib64/vdpau/libvdpau_nvidia.so -> libvdpau_nvidia.so.1 >>> Derek Burt <mailto:derekb...@gmail.com> >>> Monday, January 19, 2015 4:03 PM >>> judi...@bigpond.net.au <mailto:judi...@bigpond.net.au> >>> >>> On 19/01/2015 8:27 pm, mo.ucina wrote: >>> > Hello Stephen, >>> > >>> > Can you please run a set of packages on this one when time >>> permits . >>> > On another topic I am on the rev 169 of the current 340.65 >>> drivers for >>> > el7 64bit. I know that 170 had a small bug , which prompted >>> the 171 >>> > release . I tried the 171 but it gave me stuttered video on >>> mythtv . >>> > Have you tried it your self , is it working ok for you ? So I have >>> > fallen back to 169 for the time being . >>> > >>> > Best Regards >>> > Milorad >>> > >>> Milorad, >>> >>> I'm running 171 release on el6 x86_64 and f19 i386 which seem >>> OK. There >>> may be something different as they are created in a completely >>> different >>> way due to the creation on a vm now. I'll have a look and see if >>> I can >>> find any more differences between 169 and 171. >>> >>> On the 365 front it should be built automatically - I'll check >>> the script. >>> >>> >>> I had issues with vpdau on the latest packages (.65) on el7 x86_64. >>> I had to move the files for vdpau around to match what was in the >>> .58 packages and move some symlinks to get everything working >>> again. My apologies but I didn't document exactly what the issue >>> was, was just trying to get the frontend running again and didn't >>> take good notes :( Sufficed to say, some of the vdpau related files >>> had changed locations, etc. Other than vdpau, everything seems to >>> be running okay now. >>> >>> Derek >>> _______________________________________________ >>> atrpms-users mailing list >>> atrpms-users@atrpms.net >>> http://lists.atrpms.net/mailman/listinfo/atrpms-users >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> atrpms-users mailing list >> atrpms-users@atrpms.net >> http://lists.atrpms.net/mailman/listinfo/atrpms-users > _______________________________________________ atrpms-users mailing list atrpms-users@atrpms.net http://lists.atrpms.net/mailman/listinfo/atrpms-users
_______________________________________________ atrpms-users mailing list atrpms-users@atrpms.net http://lists.atrpms.net/mailman/listinfo/atrpms-users
