Speaking of emscripten, I have a few horror stories of my own. But I have to say that it is quite an impressive project. I once said that it was a small miracle that the entire ATS compiler (atsopt) can actually be compiled into JS successfully via emscripten. The generated C code alone consists of at least 500K lines. In general, emscripten is not well-suited for handling C code generated from ATS that makes use of higher-order functions. I almost gave up. At the end, templates saved the day: I replaced various higher-order functions in atsopt with templates to allow them to be properly eliminated (through inlining). This kind of replacement had been designed to support the use of higher-order functions in embedded programming, but it was used in this very peculiar setting to solve a very peculiar problem :)
Cheers! On Tuesday, May 3, 2016 at 4:56:31 PM UTC-4, Raoul Duke wrote: > > (i think only via emscripten, a route i personally do not like, but ymmv.) > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "ats-lang-users" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to ats-lang-users+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. To post to this group, send email to ats-lang-users@googlegroups.com. Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/ats-lang-users. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/ats-lang-users/3a440f0e-8296-4789-a947-bf56d0671010%40googlegroups.com.
