On Thu, Apr 28 2005, Reiner Steib wrote:
> I have committed font-latex.el and will change auctex.texi and
> changes.texi accordingly.
I have replaced the table...
--8<---------------cut here---------------start------------->8---
@table @code
@item font-latex-match-title-1-keywords
Keywords for level 1 sectioning [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Face: @code{font-latex-title-1-face}
[...]
@item font-latex-match-title-4-keywords
Keywords for level 4 sectioning [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Face: @code{font-latex-title-4-face}
@end table
--8<---------------cut here---------------end--------------->8---
... by:
--8<---------------cut here---------------start------------->8---
@vindex font-latex-match-title-0-keywords
[...]
@vindex font-latex-match-title-5-keywords
You can add your own sectioning commands be adding them to the keyword
lists: @code{font-latex-match-title-0-keywords}
(@code{font-latex-sectioning-0-face}) @dots{}
@code{font-latex-match-title-5-keywords}
(@code{font-latex-sectioning-5-face}).
--8<---------------cut here---------------end--------------->8---
I don't see the benefit for listing all lists and faces explicitly
here. If someone wants to have the full table, feel free to change
it.
While at it... Is the use of @vindex correct for faces or should I
have used @cindex?
,----
| @defopt font-latex-fontify-sectioning
| @c Is @vindex correct?
| @vindex font-latex-sectioning-0-face
`----
Bye, Reiner.
--
,,,
(o o)
---ooO-(_)-Ooo--- | PGP key available | http://rsteib.home.pages.de/
_______________________________________________
auctex-devel mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/auctex-devel
