* David Kastrup (2005-05-09) writes: > Ralf Angeli <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > >> * David Kastrup (2005-05-09) writes: >> >>> After thinking this over, I have decided that the sanest course is >>> to release "standalone" versions of preview-latex with the version >>> numbers from AUCTeX. It makes clear what versions belong together >>> and are more up-to-date than whatever else. It also means that >>> version 0.9.2 will not be released at all, but rather be 11.80. [...] >> If you don't provide tarballs, what exactly is a "standalone" >> release of preview-latex then? > > Who is talking about standalone releases?
Uh, you? At least that's how I understood the phrase �to release "standalone" versions of preview-latex� in the paragraph quoted above. >>> Another thing I am wondering about is FAQ/README/INSTALL/whatever >>> for preview-latex. Take a look at the current distribution >>> directory on ftp.gnu.org. What is the most sensible place/naming >>> for them? >> >> I'd set up a separate directory for each AUCTeX or prevew-latex >> release. The main directory is already too crowded. > > Uh, we already have a separate directory for extra stuff related to > separate releases. Which does not make finding stuff related to a certain release significantly easier in my opinion. It's a step into the right direction but does not go far enough. > The main tarballs are different though: pretty > much every project on ftp.gnu.org distributes them from the main > directory. There are also projects which put the files into subdirectories when the top directory tends to get overcrowded. gcc may serve as a prominent example. -- Ralf _______________________________________________ auctex-devel mailing list [email protected] http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/auctex-devel
