Ralf Angeli <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> * David Kastrup (2005-12-15) writes:
>
>> I'd tend to mention in the release notes that there have been no
>> changes this time apart from the version number, but still go
>> through the motions.
>
> Then decoupling the version numbers of the preview package and
> AUCTeX/preview-latex might really make sense in the long run.
I don't think so. Particularly with -without-texmf-dir a version of
preview.sty that is intimately connected with AUCTeX gets installed
into the Emacs tree. I don't think it makes sense giving different
version numbers to this integrated version from the encompassing
AUCTeX, or from external preview versions.
> Is there such a connection at all, that certain versions of
> preview-latex only work with certain versions of preview?
Well, yes. That is why we have something like
(defcustom preview-default-preamble
'("\\RequirePackage[" ("," . preview-default-option-list)
"]{preview}[2004/11/05]")
^^^^^^^^^^^^
[...]
There is some leeway involved, but whenever preview.el requires
something new, we are going to have to bump that date.
--
David Kastrup, Kriemhildstr. 15, 44793 Bochum
_______________________________________________
auctex-devel mailing list
auctex-devel@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/auctex-devel
