On Thu, Feb 10, 2011 at 10:52 PM, Ralf Angeli <ang...@caeruleus.net> wrote: >> I agree with Tassilo, that would allow us to get rid of cvs entirely. >> Moreover, that would let me easily handle the 2 patches I sent to the >> mailing list that were not merged (yet?). > > That's because we haven't concluded our discussion on the patches yet. > Switching the VCS won't help with that.
That's ok if the patches take time to merge, I can perfectly understand. However, a DVCS would allow me to easily maintain my own fork :-). -- Damien Cassou http://damiencassou.seasidehosting.st "Lambdas are relegated to relative obscurity until Java makes them popular by not having them." James Iry _______________________________________________ auctex-devel mailing list auctex-devel@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/auctex-devel
