On Jan 21, 2013, at 8:26 PM, Ralf Angeli <ang...@caeruleus.net> wrote:
> * Ivan Andrus (2013-01-21) writes: > >> On Jan 21, 2013, at 4:07 PM, Tassilo Horn <t...@gnu.org> wrote: >> >>> Tassilo Horn <t...@gnu.org> writes: >>> >>> I just want to add that XEmacs doesn't have `special-mode', so you'll >>> have to make some extra work to get a consistent behavior across all >>> kinds and versions of supported emacsen. >> >> I was afraid of that. I'll try to test on Emacs 21 and XEmacs 21.4.15 >> [1], unless it's okay to test on later versions. > > I think with respect to XEmacs it would be sufficient to test with the > latest stable version, i.e. currently 21.4.22. Here is my first version of the patch. Any comments welcome. Particularly I'm not sure my placement (at the end of tex-buf.el) is right, nor that the ChangeLog is detailed enough. I tested on XEmacs 21.4.22 and Emacs 22.1.1 as well as more recent versions. Older versions of Emacs didn't build on intel OS X apparently. I only tested it with LaTeX (i.e. not plain TeX etc.) but I don't think there should be any dependency on that. -Ivan
output-mode.patch
Description: Binary data
_______________________________________________ auctex-devel mailing list auctex-devel@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/auctex-devel
