Stefan Monnier <monn...@iro.umontreal.ca> writes: >>> I'd be OK with splitting auctex into 2 packages, but does >>> preview-latex work without auctex? >> No. It would be nice to factor out some of its quite sophisticated >> functionality into something independent from AUCTeX, LaTeX and in fact >> also TeX, but at the current point of time preview-latex is not >> independently useful. > > I'm not sure you're answering my question, so let me rephrase it: does > it work with tex-mode.el?
The answer remains "No". "Independent from AUCTeX, LaTeX and in fact also TeX" is a graded answer. As preview-latex is not independently useful without AUCTeX, it does not work with tex-mode.el. tex-mode.el would probably be low-hanging fruit as adapting preview-latex would basically require finding/abstracting a common process/commandline model for both AUCTeX and tex-mode.el. But so far nobody hated AUCTeX enough to find that worth the trouble... -- David Kastrup _______________________________________________ auctex-devel mailing list auctex-devel@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/auctex-devel
