Hello, ** Mosè Giordano [2014-08-12 16:45:47 +0200]: > 2014-08-12 14:49 GMT+02:00 Tassilo Horn <t...@gnu.org>: >> Mosè Giordano <m...@gnu.org> writes:
>>> Ok, a possibility would be to change the value accepted by >>> `LaTeX-insert-label' to, e.g, >>> (t . ("section" . section) ("subsection" . environment)) >>> so each element of the CDR is a cons, whose CAR is the name of the >>> macro/environment, and the CDR is the type. >> Quite complex. Maybe it would be simpler to have special keys for the >> alist, e.g., >> ((environment-whitelist "figure" "table") >> (environment-blacklist ...) >> (section-whitelist ...) >> (section-blacklist ...)) >> And basically, having both a *-whitelist and a *-blacklist doesn't >> really make much sense. So it could be compressed to, e.g., >> ((environments t "figure" "table") >> (sections nil "paragraph" "paragraph*" "subparagraph" "subparagraph*")) >> meaning that only figure and table environments get a label (t = >> whitelist), and only sections "larger" than paragraph get one (nil = >> blacklist). > My idea of using t for blacklist and nil for whitelist was due to the > fact that for the base cases (always insert label, never insert > labels) I used t and nil, and adding exceptions was as simple as > adding elements to the list, keeping the same first element (t or > nil), though I agree t is logically more adapt for a whitelist and nil > for a blacklist. > However, I'll try to implement this interface later today. >>> The `LaTeX-label' function must be changed to take a second mandatory >>> argument specifying the type of the macro/environment to be labeled. >> I think `LaTeX-label' can figure that out on its own by calling >> `LaTeX-current-environment'. If that returns "document", we're probably >> inserting a section label, else we're inserting an environment label. > Well, in beamer you can add a sectioning command inside a frame > environment. This is not the standard behavior but it's legal to > insert a sectioning command inside an environment different from > document. In addition `LaTeX-current-environment' isn't bullet-proof, > so avoid using it would be nice ;-) >From the first proposition by Mosè Giordano, I thought that I could "advise" corresponding label function to which macro, environment or place in document insert a label macro. Also, I imagined that there will be some function that allows, depending on context to use a customized prefix (for example, "fig" for figures, "tab" for tables, "eq" for equations, "page" for page-labels) and may be some function to generate unique labels (part after a prefix or may be complete label), not only simple counting. But seems I was wrong. According to the following discussion seems that the proposed 'LaTeX-label' will be too complex and cumbersome. P.S. I got into this discussion only because Mosè Giordano mentioned some subtle LaTeX features (the usage macros and environments with the same name). --- WBR, Vladimir Lomov -- "Hi, I'm Professor Alan Ginsburg... But you can call me... Captain Toke." -- John Lovitz, as ex-Supreme Court nominee Alan Ginsburg, on SNL _______________________________________________ auctex-devel mailing list auctex-devel@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/auctex-devel