|
Hi I have tons of latex documents with the following alias: \newcommand{\setR}{{\mathord{\mathbb R}}} The reason is that in X-symbol-mode, for reason unknown to me, decided only to display \setR by a symbol, but not the original AMS {\mathbb R}. I know I could write a lisp function which would replace back and forwards between these two commands, I say back and forward because I might use GNU Emacs and Xemacs for some time together. In any case I got curious and thought of either appending the new commands as symbols to tex--prettify-symbols-alist Like (add-to-list 'tex--prettify-symbols-alist '(("\\setN" . ?ℕ) ("\\setP" . ?ℙ) ("\\setR" . ?ℝ) ("\\setZ" . ?ℤ))) Or just modifying the list itself and explicitly adding this symbols. In both cases it did not work, prettify mode did not even display the symbols. So the question is simply that I cannot have ("\\Bbb{R}" . ?ℝ) and ("\\setR" . ?ℝ) In the same list? So a list is really one-to-one? Thanks Uwe Brauer |
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature
_______________________________________________ auctex-devel mailing list auctex-devel@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/auctex-devel
