I have to agree. I became so frustrated with M-x TeX-doc that I ended up rolling my own function to do exactly as you describe.
Of course, another option is to make an enhancement to texdoc (the ultimate tool) to provide a list of these 'keys' for completion's sake. A close inspection of texdoc's own documentation [1] might obviate this, however. Best, Sean [1]: http://texdoc.net/texmf-dist/doc/texdoc/texdoc.pdf On Thu, Dec 10, 2015 at 10:31 AM Mosè Giordano <m...@gnu.org> wrote: > Dear all, > > am I the only one who finds `TeX-doc' overly complicated to the point > it's sometimes useless? It fails to find documentation for many > packages and classes, also pretty common ones like "babel", "fontenc", > and "memoir". Wouldn't it better if it simply runs "texdoc NAME"? > Aucompletion is cool, but in this case is often useless as the > manual's basenames don't have to, and many times don't, match the name > of the package. > > Bye, > Mosè > > _______________________________________________ > auctex-devel mailing list > auctex-devel@gnu.org > https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/auctex-devel >
_______________________________________________ auctex-devel mailing list auctex-devel@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/auctex-devel
