Hi Mosè, Mosè Giordano <m...@gnu.org> writes:
> am I the only one who finds `TeX-doc' overly complicated to the point > it's sometimes useless? It fails to find documentation for many > packages and classes, also pretty common ones like "babel", "fontenc", > and "memoir". Wouldn't it better if it simply runs "texdoc NAME"? > Aucompletion is cool, but in this case is often useless as the > manual's basenames don't have to, and many times don't, match the name > of the package. I agree. My suggestion is also to reduce this function to run "texdoc NAME". `C-u TeX-doc' could run "texdoc -l NAME" and let the user choose a number. I also agree that autocompletion is useless here. If I get it right MikTeX also includes "texdoc", so it seems to be portable as well. Best, Arash _______________________________________________ auctex-devel mailing list auctex-devel@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/auctex-devel
