Hi Ikumi, Ikumi Keita <ik...@ikumi.que.jp> writes:
> Hi Arash, thanks for your comment. Sorry for being late to reply, since > I don't subscribe to auctex-devel. I found your message on the web > archive http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/auctex-devel/ . I read this list also through Gmane, I use nntp://news.gmane.org/, maybe that is more convenient for you as well. >> Is there a particular reason why the remainder in tex-jp.el >> shouldn't move into tex.el as well? > > The primary reason is being conservative. Well, I think that applies to Emacs users in general ;-) > I know little about these viewers, and cannot judge whether they are > harmless for environments without Japanese support. So I left them in > tex-jp.el, which is loaded only when Japanese tex is required. (At > least the line relevant to xdvi is such an example because the > construct `%(xdvi)' is defined in tex-jp.el.) > > So don't mind to move the viewers into tex.el if you know that they > does not raise problems in non-Japanese tex environments. I'm not OSX, so I can't say. SumatraPDF is based on MuPDF, so it should work without problems. I used xdvi long time ago, it worked for me then. Reg. TeXworks and TeXShop, I can't say, I never used any other editor than Emacs for LaTeX editing. But I agree with Mosè that it also seems odd to me to use the viewer from another editor, namely TeXworks and TeXShop. Best, Arash _______________________________________________ auctex-devel mailing list auctex-devel@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/auctex-devel
