Uwe Brauer <[email protected]> writes: > > I don't think it makes sense to have a separate node in the TOC > > which is just one or two paragraphs long and just references > > siblings of its own. > > It is all about presenting/displaying/finding. I think most people > don't read the documentation linearly as a book but jump to the parts > which look most interesting.
Yeah. My guess was that when they are hunting for eye candy, they might jump directly to (info "(auctex)Display"), so the intro there might be a good place for discussing the WYSIWYG features of AUCTeX. > That is why I think it were good to have such an entry, and one for > preview-LaTeX as well. How should people know about preview-LaTeX when > they look up the manual? Maybe because it is mentioned in the overview of AUCTeX: ,----[ (info "(auctex)Summary") ] | One component of AUCTeX that LaTeX users will find attractive is | preview-latex, a combination of folding and in-source previewing that | provides true "What You See Is What You Get" experience in your | sourcebuffer, while letting you retain full control. `---- > However I will not find for it, if you still think it should not have > a TOC, then be it. Yes, please. Just write a nice WYSIWYG paragraph at the beginning at (info "(auctex)Display"). > Ok, next time, that is this afternoon I will send a different patch and > will try it out first on my local git repo. Ok, thanks. Bye, Tassilo _______________________________________________ auctex-devel mailing list [email protected] https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/auctex-devel
