Arash Esbati <arash.esbati...@gmail.com> writes: Hi Arash,
>> Hm, the anomaly sounds strange. Anyhow, your patch looks very good, >> so feel free to commit it as is. I'll try to reproduce that issue >> then an see if there can be something done. > > Thanks. My original approach is attached as myminted.el. The only > difference is the re-arrangement at the beginning of the file and the > ,(list "style" (LaTeX-minted-style-list)) line in > `LaTeX-minted-key-val-options'. Just a nitpick, I think ("style" ,(LaTeX-minted-style-list)) is slightly more readable (and completely equivalent). > Here a small .tex file for testing. When I restart Emacs and open > this file, Emacs asks if I want to apply TeX-command-extra-options: > "-shell-escape" and then does not kill the frame. This happens only > on the first run, after that, it works as expected. I can't reproduce that with neither the current Emacs master branch nor Emacs 25.1 (starting them with -Q) and the current AUCTeX master. For me, the window where Emacs asks if the file-local variable should be applied is buried after I give my response. But you say the "frame" is not killed. Do we talk about the same thing? A frame in Emacs is what everyone else calls a window (i.e., an X11 window with a title bar), and a window in Emacs is what most people would call a pane. Bye, Tassilo _______________________________________________ auctex-devel mailing list auctex-devel@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/auctex-devel