>>>>> "Tassilo" == Tassilo Horn <t...@gnu.org> writes:
Tassilo> Mosè Giordano <m...@gnu.org> writes: Hi!
>>> Do you all agree to make this an option? If so, I can update the
>>> patch to accommodate that.
>>
>> I'm not still convinced that the patch you propose is a good
>> idea. Why should people run "View" command to *not* view the
>> document?
Tassilo> I know what Hong's referring to. You want to view the
Tassilo> document in Evince but keep editing in emacs, thus the
Tassilo> input focus should stick there.
To me, and assuming I have not totally misunderstood the proposal, there
seems to be a philosophical issue here. If you were to write a program,
you wouldn't expect to view the output of the compilation as you
enter the code. You might look at an initial output but then you would
concentrate on the code before compiling again - you surely wouldn't do
both simultaneously. TeX/LaTeX is also code, so why would not the same
expectation apply? I apologise if I have misunderstood.
--
--
Colin Baxter
m43...@yandex.com
GnuPG fingerprint: 68A8 799C 0230 16E7 BF68 2A27 BBFA 2492 91F5 41C8
_______________________________________________
auctex-devel mailing list
auctex-devel@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/auctex-devel
