>>>>> Ikumi Keita <ik...@ikumi.que.jp> writes: > Hi developpers, I'd like to commit a change proposed in > https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/auctex/2018-05/msg00014.html in > order to resolve problems addressed in > https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/auctex/2018-05/msg00003.html > https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/auctex/2018-05/msg00004.html . > Are there anyone who doesn't agree with this?
> As explained in ealier messages, this patch introduces some > incompatibilities: - Users cannot put raw TeX codes in the command > line like latex -interaction=nonstopmode \SOME_CODE \input > FILENAME via setting `TeX-command-extra-options' anymore, as long > as the default `TeX-command-list' is used. - (Pdf)latex binaries > without e-TeX extension have the following two limitations: > 1. Preview-latex does not work. (This can be circumvented by > customizing `preview-LaTeX-command' and > `preview-undump-replacements' to cancel the change by my patch, > though) 2. Region compilation (C-c C-r, C-c C-e etc.) does not > work. I.e., such binaries can only use C-c C-c (and C-c C-a) to > typeset the latex documents. If you consider that these > incompatibilities are not acceptable, please express your opinion. > I would be ready to discuss about this. > If no objection, I'll commit the change in a few days. Adding > document changes and regression tests will follow later. > Best regards, Ikumi Keita > P.S. I tested the patch with MikTeX briefly, and encountered no > errors. I really do not like what I understand to be this suggestion. If users cannot put TeX codes in a command then extensive functionality is lost. The bar on non-ascii file names seems trivial to me - sorry. _______________________________________________ auctex-devel mailing list auctex-devel@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/auctex-devel