>>>>> Tassilo Horn <t...@gnu.org> writes: >> Tassilo, is this the intended behavior? Am I missing something?
> No, I guess that's not how it is supposed to be but a leftover when I > turned the hard-coded macro version to macros & environments. The > functions the macro generates must refer to the *-table variable they > defined with this macro call and nothing else, so all > TeX-expert-macro-table occurrences there should actually be > ,(intern (format "%s-expert-%s-table" prefix thing)). I see, thank you. > I'm also not sure if we might not want to remove that feature. AFAIK, > there has never been any serious attempt to classify the macros & > environments provided by our styles. There are just 6 styles using > `TeX-declare-expert-macros' and one single style using > `LaTeX-declare-expert-environments'. Hmm. Classifying needs detailed knowledge or experience with each package, so it would generally be not easy to decide which macros/environments are expert... Regards, Ikumi Keita
