> Hi Keita, > Ikumi Keita <ik...@ikumi.que.jp> writes:
> Thanks for raising this inconsistency. My vote is to harmonize this and > add all math environments to `LaTeX-indent-environment-list', > i.e. disabling filling. Then the question is how a user can control the > custom variable when we add entries to it as a style is loaded like in > your patch above? For example, how can I decide here that "multline" > shouldn't be in that variable? Or am I missing something? I am deeply puzzled now. 1. I like Keita's patch because it results in filling with a much better indenting. 2. But, are you saying the price for this is that auto-filling is disabled and I have to deal with very long equations myself? Why is this so? I'd rather would like to have nice indentation and auto-filling. Rational: more and more (No emacs) users use editor that support virtual filling and that results in long equation. It is true that virtual-auto-fill-mode (available in MELPA) is quite good, but I still prefer good all breaks at 70 chars, and therefore auto-fill-mode Uwe
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature