* Matthieu Moy (2005-08-23) writes: > Ralf Angeli <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > >> As I am attracted to the solution with `outline-mark-subtree' because >> of its simplicity, I'd use it despite XEmacs not providing it. If it >> is bound, use it, and if it isn't, use the code we currently have in >> `LaTeX-mark-section'. > > Then, the best solution is perhaps to use outline-mark-subtree if > it's bound, and use my other patch otherwise.
I don't like this solution because it would add a lot of code only for XEmacs and only because XEmacs ships a prehistoric version of outline.el. The code would have to be maintained and taken care of once XEmacs catches up with Emacs. This will be much less of a problem if we don't introduce it in the first place. -- Ralf _______________________________________________ auctex mailing list [email protected] http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/auctex
