Ralf Angeli <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > * Ralf Angeli (2008-05-31) writes: > >> I'm not sure if this is flexible enough. The scheme does not cater for >> the situation where one wants to use a completely different string if >> the optional argument is not found. For example for "\item[foo]" you >> might wanna display "foo:" but for "\item" just "*". > > I've now opted for a different scheme. One can define complete > alternatives with a "||" separator.
Is there a reason for using "||" instead of "|"? -- David Kastrup, Kriemhildstr. 15, 44793 Bochum _______________________________________________ auctex mailing list auctex@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/auctex
