Tassilo Horn <[email protected]> writes: > Nicolas Richard <[email protected]> writes: > >>> Why don't people read it? > > I think most people have the assumption that when specifying a --prefix, > then everything will be underneath that.
Then perhaps we should just do that and just print a prominent warning when the result will not work without additional user-level configuration. > The config.log suggests that's the case because the directory is not > in load-path. But how could I add that to load-path given that > configure calls emacs with --batch which implies -q? It does not imply --no-site-init IIRC. At any rate: while there was a wagonload of work invested in that area, it would appear that some of that meets the label "too clever". -- David Kastrup _______________________________________________ auctex mailing list [email protected] https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/auctex
