Mark Jago <[email protected]> writes: Hi Mark,
> Thanks for all the input. Although it looks very intriguing, excuse me > for bringing the conversation to a more simple level... The discussion > is a bit beyond my current knowledge of AUCTeX. > > How should one interpret your findings from a high-level point of > view? Is there a version incompatibility with Emacs, AUCTeX and > Ghostcscript, and I happen to have a setup that causes problems to > preview certain documents? If so, what solution do you suggest? The problem that I have, is that preview won't work if you use GhostScript 9.09 and compile your tex document to PDF (TeX-PDF-mode is on). Preview still works if you compile to DVI (TeX-PDF-mode is off). That's actually a problem with GhostScript (pdf2dsc crashes on all PDF files), not with preview. However, I'm not sure if you're facing the same problem as I do. You only say that it doesn't work with lipics while it does with other classes. That suggests it's a different problem and not related to compiling with latex vs. compiling with pdflatex. So please open the problematic tex file, enable previews, and then do M-x preview-report-bug RET. You'll get a new mail buffer containing lots of information about your setup, the ghostscript version, etc. Either send that mail as a new bug report, or just copy and paste it into a reply to this mail. Bye, Tassilo _______________________________________________ auctex mailing list [email protected] https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/auctex
