Vincent Belaïche <vincent....@hotmail.fr> writes: >> FWIW, I wouldn't mind releasing with that patch and an appropriate >> info doc update & NEWS entry (Vincent, could you please add that?) > > Yes, of course, I will do that in the next patch version.
Do that once we have settled on a specific patch version. > Please make me know whether you are happy with the sorted-list based > implementation of style-hook set arithmetic, or if you think that > bitmaps are better. Since you said that bitmaps would be easier to maintain, shorter, and simpler, I'm in favor of that. See my other mail. > Also what about the nor/not discussion, I suggest that we keep only > `nor' and rename it `not'. Do you agree ? No, see my other mail. I don't get why (not (or :a :b)) isn't equivalent to (nor :a :b) in every case. And in my book, the logical `not' is always unary. Bye, Tassilo _______________________________________________ auctex mailing list auctex@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/auctex
