Mosè Giordano <[email protected]> writes: Hi Mosè,
>>> Debbugs has been enabled for AUCTeX, then from now on every new >>> email to [email protected] will open a new ticket on debbugs, to >>> which you should reply by writing to [email protected], with NNN >>> being the ticket number (if you reply by writing to >>> [email protected] you'll open a *new* ticket). >> >> Phew, do you know what happens if someone replies to an existing >> (pre-debbugs) bug report? I hope that won't create a new report... > > Unfortunately it will, this is the drawback of the transition period. Ah, I hoped that debbugs would be so clever and treat messages with References header differently. BTW, what's now with the gmane.emacs.auctex.bugs newsgroup gateway to the bug-auctex mailing list? Should we request that it is made read-only (as a kind of archive) or deleted altogether? And the same question applies to the bug-auctex list itself. Does that still receive bugs reported with `TeX-submit-bug-report', i.e., mails sent to bug-auctex? > The ticket already present for the AUCTeX package (should we close it? > IIRC the number of warnings has been reduced) Yeah, we made it from 300 warnings down to 270. That can easily be considered as "fixed". ;-) Fun aside: I'd suggest to just let it there. Maybe it'll motivate someone to squash some other warnings. > is also a follow-up of an existing bug report, so we are accustomed to > that ;-) Yes, but we should try to keep that transition phase short. For example, if the bug-auctex list is basically offline now, we could inform all its subscribers of the switch to debbugs. Bye, Tassilo _______________________________________________ auctex mailing list [email protected] https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/auctex
