Hi Dieter, On So, lis 01 2014, Dr. Ing. Dieter Jurzitza wrote: > Hi folks, > tha patch had been proposed by Michal Sojka on December, 14, 2012. Ralf > Angeli > replied to the suggestion, saying the patch was kind of crude - well, I could > upload the patch again, but according to my understanding of your comment > this > does not seem to be the point here. > > Should I try to get in touch with the author and ask him whether or not he > would copyright it to the FSF, I am simply missing the appropriate > understanding? Would it be enough to have a kind of written statement that he > does not care about the ownership of the code?
I'm glad you like my patch. I did it as a quick hack to help me prepare an image-intensive document. As far as I remember, for inclusion to AUCTeX it would be necessary to rewrite the patch and make the code more configurable. I have not found time to do it, but if you (or somebody else) would devote the time to it I'd be happy to help. And of course, I'd have no problems with copyright assignment to FSF. Best regards, -Michal _______________________________________________ auctex mailing list [email protected] https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/auctex
