This sounds way more than reasonable.... During this detective process I found many other flaws in my settings... At least I cleared this issue. Or at least so I hope...
On Fri, Dec 19, 2014 at 11:30 PM, David Kastrup <[email protected]> wrote: > > Dror Atariah <[email protected]> writes: > > > I think I narrowed the problem to the following statement: (defalias > 'push > > 'org-mobile-push) which is almost the last one in my setup. If I comment > it > > out I can use AUCTeX 11.88 without any problems... > > > > Does it make any sense? > > Well, replacing a core macro like "push" with something completely > different is not a good idea. > > I am surprised that only AUCTeX comes crashing down around your head. > > > push is a Lisp macro in `subr.el'. > > (push NEWELT PLACE) > > Add NEWELT to the list stored in the generalized variable PLACE. > This is morally equivalent to (setf PLACE (cons NEWELT PLACE)), > except that PLACE is only evaluated once (after NEWELT). > > [back] > > > -- > David Kastrup > -- Dror Atariah, Ph.D. de.linkedin.com/in/atariah
_______________________________________________ auctex mailing list [email protected] https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/auctex
