Le 05/02/15 à 17h52, Nicolas Richard <theonewiththeevill...@yahoo.fr> a écrit :
>>> I deprecated \includeonly in favor of TeX-command-region, and I now do >>> collaborative editing through auto-synchronisation of files (owncloud, >>> dropbox) instead of sending files around. So I'm now a happy >>> one-file-does-it-all kind of LaTeX user. >> >> Even big one-files? > > Size doesn't matter when using TeX-command-region. I'm working on a > 400kB beamer file right now, and it's doing pretty well. OK. BTW, is it possible to ask for another name for the output file than `_region_'? In particular, is it possible for this name to be the evaluation of (file-name-base buffer-file-name), possibly copied in antother directory? Maybe Latexmk could be helpful for this. >>> The main advantage for me is ease of searching and refactoring. I know >>> that auctex and friends have tools for working on multi-file documents, >>> but my muscle memory keeps making me press C-s, C-M-%, M-s o etc. >> >> My muscle memory keeps making me press C-c C-c instead of C-c C-b >> (`TeX-command-buffer`) and I often recompile the whole document instead >> of only the current buffer :( > > It happens to me too, but then I notice it, hit C-c C-k and C-c C-b > again because I know these bindings. I guess all the references, citations, etc. have then to be recomputed... > The reftex-*-document commands don't even have bindings afaics. Thanks > to this discussion, I had a look into the manual: (info "(reftex) Key > Bindings"). Maybe I'll do that and use them. I don't see your point. -- Denis _______________________________________________ auctex mailing list auctex@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/auctex