jfbu <[email protected]> writes: >> I had changed a bit font-lock stuff in order go a step towards LaTeX3 >> highlighting. Basically, macros used to be hard-coded as \\[a-zA-Z]+ >> and now they are recognized as a \\ followed by one or many symbol or >> word characters. However, | had symbol syntax, thus the | in >> \foobar| was treated as being part of the macro. > > Which syntax do you give to the colon : ? > > In LaTeX3 it is (afaik) often used in macro names, but in real life > for end users it will be more often found like \this: <- was a > typographical colon. This is less of an issue for the _.
That's the point. expl3 gives it symbol syntax but in normal tex/latex it is punctuation. Bye, Tassilo _______________________________________________ auctex mailing list [email protected] https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/auctex
