Ooops... I had completely forgotten about that. At least that demonstrate how
constant I am in my way of thinking.
So, the only thing to do is to replace the assoc-string by this
TeX-assoc-string, right ?
Vincent.
----------------------------------------
> From: m...@gnu.org
> Date: Mon, 9 Nov 2015 22:48:05 +0100
> Subject: Re: [AUCTeX] Patch to tex-info.el to support node name completion in
> @..ref commands, and solve a few other pbs
> To: vincent....@hotmail.fr
> CC: auctex@gnu.org
>
> Hi Vincent,
>
> 2015-11-09 17:55 GMT+01:00 Vincent Belaïche <vincent....@hotmail.fr>:
>> Dear Mosé,
>>
>> No there was no strong reason for assoc-string rather than assoc, the
>> point was just that when you know that the key is a string assoc-string
>> is supposed to be faster.
>>
>> My opinion --- with no regard to this specific patch --- is that it
>> would better in the case of XEmacs to define assoc-string as an alias of
>> assoc if the function is unbound.
>
> Well, it turned out there was already an alias `TeX-assoc-string' you
> defined last year ;-)
>
> Bye,
> Mosè
_______________________________________________
auctex mailing list
auctex@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/auctex
