A lion as a logo it sounds good
> El 23/02/2016, a las 13:34, David Kastrup <[email protected]> escribió: > > Mosè Giordano <[email protected]> writes: > >> 2016-02-23 12:07 GMT+01:00 EglobalpresS <[email protected]>: >>> What do you think about develop a logo with a bit movement? >> >> Do you mean an animated logo? If so, it can't be a GIF, see >> https://www.gnu.org/philosophy/gif.html > > Which starts with > > There is no special patent threat to GIF format nowadays as far as > we know; the patents that were used to attack GIF have > expired. Nonetheless, this article will remain pertinent as long as > programs can be forbidden by patents, since the same sorts of things > could happen in any area of computing. See our web site policies > regarding GIFs, and our web guidelines. > > which leads to > > In the past, GIFs have had patent problems. However, now that the > IBM and Unisys patents (and other patents world-wide that are > relevant to LZW compression) have expired, GIFs that are based on > the 87a or 89a standard are acceptable. Please be wary of > proprietary applications that may include non-standard patented > technologies (we'd prefer you use free software applications when > authoring for our websites). In general, PNG or JPEG format, are > still safe, and are probably better from a technical standpoint. For > details regarding the old GIF problem, see > http://www.gnu.org/philosophy/gif.html. Other formats are also > allowed, though JPEG is the one most widely recognized by Web > browsers (be careful with JPEG 2000, as well as PNG alpha channels, > as it includes features not fully supported by older browsers). > > That being said, I consider animated logos highly rude. They distract > from the content. > > -- > David Kastrup _______________________________________________ auctex mailing list [email protected] https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/auctex
