Hi Tristan, I don't know what went wrong in ELPA, but actually also in the tarball the version seems to be wrong: I get `release_11_91'. This isn't really *wrong*, but I'd have expected it to be `11.91', and this may be the reason for the inaccurate version number in ELPA. Will look into this, thanks.
Bye, Mosè 2017-07-27 15:39 GMT+02:00 Tristan Miller <psychon...@nothingisreal.com>: > Greetings. > > On Mon, 24 Jul 2017 12:09:02 +0200, m...@gnu.org (Mosè > Giordano) wrote: >> Release notes for AUCTeX 11.91 with preview-latex >> ================================================= > > I just installed AUCTeX 11.91 via ELPA. Why, then, does C-h v > AUCTeX-version RET result in "11.90.2.2017-07-25"? Did someone forget > to bump the version number before the release? > > Regards, > Tristan > > -- > =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=- > Tristan Miller > Free Software developer, ferret herder, logologist > https://logological.org/ > =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=- > > _______________________________________________ > auctex mailing list > auctex@gnu.org > https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/auctex > _______________________________________________ auctex mailing list auctex@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/auctex
