David Kastrup <[email protected]> writes: > Rodolfo Medina <[email protected]> writes: > >> David Kastrup <[email protected]> writes: >> >>> With regard to functions: instead of using keyboard macros, you can >>> first call some complex command like query-replace-regexp, then use >>> >>> C-x ESC ESC (translated from C-x <escape> <escape>) runs the command >>> repeat-complex-command (found in global-map), which is an interactive >>> compiled Lisp function in ‘simple.el’. >>> >>> It is bound to <again>, <redo>, C-x M-:, C-x M-ESC. >>> >>> (repeat-complex-command ARG) >>> >>> Edit and re-evaluate last complex command, or ARGth from last. >>> A complex command is one which used the minibuffer. >>> The command is placed in the minibuffer as a Lisp form for editing. >>> The result is executed, repeating the command as changed. >>> If the command has been changed or is not the most recent previous >>> command it is added to the front of the command history. >>> You can use the minibuffer history commands M-n and M-p >>> to get different commands to edit and resubmit. >>> >>> [back] >>> >>> in order to get "a Lisp form for editing" which you can copy and paste >>> into a function definition. >> >> >> Is it possible to have the same thing for any command previously given, not >> only the complex ones...? Also `M-a', `C-f'...? > > Doesn't C-h k M-a give sufficient information for those?
Yes... sorry Rodolfo _______________________________________________ auctex mailing list [email protected] https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/auctex
