Hi Arash,
>>>>> Arash Esbati <[email protected]> writes:
> One thing occured to me: You use the following code (which was there
> before):
> (apply #'TeX-run-style-hooks
> (apply #'append
> (mapcar #'cdr LaTeX-provided-class-options)))
> Assuming that `LaTeX-provided-class-options' usually has only one entry
> (unlike `LaTeX-provided-package-options'), wouldn't be sufficient to do:
> (apply #'TeX-run-style-hooks
> (cdar LaTeX-provided-class-options))
That's the point I'd like to know. I think that the code would usually
suffice, too. I wonder why `LaTeX-provided-class-options' has a
structure which allows more than one class. Under what situation can it
have more than one entry?
> Maybe you could also mention `:classopt' in AUCTeX manual under
> `TeX-add-style-hook' [1].
Thanks for suggestion, I'll try another day.
> I did't like this implementation as I wrote it. I took it mainly since
> `mathtools' does the same thing -- and that is the only style doing this
> AFAIR (off the top of my head, though).
It seems that you are right. Then I'll take the previous method.
> I think it is cleaner to set this variable outside the style hook and
> write something like this:
> (defvar LaTeX-empheq-package-options
> (progn
> (TeX-load-style "mathtools")
> (append LaTeX-mathtools-package-options
> '("overload" "overload2"
> "ntheorem" "newmultline"
> "oldmultline")))
> "Package options for the empheq package.")
> WDYT?
With this code, if the user sets the variable in init file, the expected
code isn't evaluated so the addtional entries are not appended. Thus I
think it's better to put `TeX-load-style' and `append' outside the
`defvar'.
Best,
Ikumi Keita
_______________________________________________
auctex mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/auctex
