Hi Keita, Ikumi Keita <ik...@ikumi.que.jp> writes:
> Thus I think that AUCTeX need not collect the output now; it just has to > look at the exit code. We can use `call-process' (with `executable-find' > test in case that Texdoc isn't available) to run Texdoc. thanks for looking at this. I have one question: Would it make sense to move the (executable-find "texdoc") further up in the function body? Currently, we do: (if arg (progn (insert (shell-command-to-string (concat "texdoc --list --nointeract " pkg))) ... (cond ((null (executable-find "texdoc")) (message "texdoc not found")))) (if (executable-find "texdoc") ... (message "texdoc not found"))) The way I see it the code executes texdoc and checks later if it finds it, and then again further below in else part. Or am I missing something? Best, Arash