Hi Keita,
Ikumi Keita <[email protected]> writes:
> Thus I think that AUCTeX need not collect the output now; it just has to
> look at the exit code. We can use `call-process' (with `executable-find'
> test in case that Texdoc isn't available) to run Texdoc.
thanks for looking at this. I have one question: Would it make sense to
move the (executable-find "texdoc") further up in the function body?
Currently, we do:
(if arg
(progn
(insert (shell-command-to-string
(concat "texdoc --list --nointeract " pkg)))
...
(cond
((null (executable-find "texdoc"))
(message "texdoc not found"))))
(if (executable-find "texdoc")
...
(message "texdoc not found")))
The way I see it the code executes texdoc and checks later if it finds
it, and then again further below in else part.
Or am I missing something?
Best, Arash
