Re: Survey on screen reader Vs narration

I tend to agree with Dark here. Screen reader is better for everything other than games because it's dynamic, you can have it set very fast and the way you like it, so it increases productivity. For games, it's also better adaptable and thus makes the design easier, but of course a human voice will always be of a higher quality, or at least until something like Wavenet becomes widely available and commonly used. :-) So, where the experience matters, for character voices etc, it's better to have human narration, of course, but dynamically changing text is much easier to read and even to implement with a screen reader. Not to mention that *not* having dynamic text self-voiced supports the option of internationalization.
Lukas

_______________________________________________
Audiogames-reflector mailing list
Audiogames-reflector@sabahattin-gucukoglu.com
https://sabahattin-gucukoglu.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/audiogames-reflector
  • ... AudioGames . net Forum — General Game Discussion : ianhamilton_ via Audiogames-reflector
    • ... AudioGames . net Forum — General Game Discussion : Orko via Audiogames-reflector
    • ... AudioGames . net Forum — General Game Discussion : ianhamilton_ via Audiogames-reflector
    • ... AudioGames . net Forum — General Game Discussion : Dark via Audiogames-reflector
    • ... AudioGames . net Forum — General Game Discussion : Sightless Kombat via Audiogames-reflector
    • ... AudioGames . net Forum — General Game Discussion : lukas via Audiogames-reflector
    • ... AudioGames . net Forum — General Game Discussion : Dark via Audiogames-reflector
    • ... AudioGames . net Forum — General Game Discussion : ianhamilton_ via Audiogames-reflector

Reply via email to