Re: JAWS and its license history
See, the fun thing I tend to notice here is that NVDA doesn't have to bash Jaws. It's got a whole user base who'll do that, using such witticisms as "flaws" and "freedom science fiction" and the like. When you have that, why waste time bashing your competitors?
the reality is simple. Companies do this. I don't think it's very nice, but it's very, very common. Just look at how many times you will hear something like, "so and so does this. The leading brand doesn't". Or whatever. These can even be outright lies sometimes, yet it still happens. It's not unique to FS, by any means.
That said, I agree with you regarding draconian license terms and pricing, and they're trying to work on that apparently. Why do you think their price is coming down.
That said, a thread was raised a couple of months back about how NVDA is starting to fray. Issues are coming up and not being fixed. The fact is that while it's open-source and does a ton right, it hasn't yet reached the market stability that Jaws has. It doesn't have professional R&D on its side. That doesn't mean it's bad or will fail (far from it) but it does mean that some of the issues NVDA has, Jaws doesn't have to worry about.
-- Audiogames-reflector mailing list Audiogames-reflector@sabahattin-gucukoglu.com https://sabahattin-gucukoglu.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/audiogames-reflector
