Re: RIAA took down youTube-DL
@23, I can make a case for (a)(2) as well:
(2) No person shall manufacture, import, offer to the public, provide, or otherwise traffic in any technology, product, service, device, component, or part thereof, that—
(A) is primarily designed or produced for the purpose of circumventing a technological measure that effectively controls access to a work protected under this title;
(B) has only limited commercially significant purpose or use other than to circumvent a technological measure that effectively controls access to a work protected under this title; or
(C) is marketed by that person or another acting in concert with that person with that person's knowledge for use in circumventing a technological measure that effectively controls access to a work protected under this title.
Though (B) is questionable, its definitely logical. Additionally, one could argue that YTDL makes a case for (A) as well as (C) because YTDL does circumvent Youtube's "rolling cipher" and is (indirectly) marketed as being able to perform such circumvention.
-- Audiogames-reflector mailing list Audiogames-reflector@sabahattin-gucukoglu.com https://sabahattin-gucukoglu.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/audiogames-reflector
