Re: Keeping track of state without globals?
@10 although I do often advocate functional programming, this instance I am not actually advocating FP. the alternative solution I am proposing is just regular procedural imperativ programming.
and I think in this case I am considering the audience, since my proposal is simpler than jumping to doing OOP, since it doesn't require OP to adopt any new paradigm and to start thinking of how to organize their code in classes. The OP specifically complained about needing to learn OOP in order to solve this problem and so I am providing a way that doesn’t require any OOP sort of design, but instead just use local variables as a way to not need to deal with global mutable state. I’ll just re-iterate I don’t have a problem with OOP, but in this case it is much more doing OOP for OOP sake and the problem can be tackled more simply in a strictly procedural non-OOP way.
-- Audiogames-reflector mailing list Audiogames-reflector@sabahattin-gucukoglu.com https://sabahattin-gucukoglu.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/audiogames-reflector
